{"id":11542,"date":"2018-07-20T07:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-07-20T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/?p=11542"},"modified":"2018-07-19T19:09:45","modified_gmt":"2018-07-19T23:09:45","slug":"did-the-mva-voter-issue-change-any-maryland-primary-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/?p=11542","title":{"rendered":"Did the MVA Voter Issue Change Any Maryland Primary Results?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>By Adam Pagnucco.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The failure of the Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) to transfer data on some voters who changed their registration information to the State Board of Elections (SBE) has attracted lots of attention from the press and members of the General Assembly.\u00a0 Here is a key question: did it actually change the outcomes of any elections?\u00a0 New data allows us to examine this issue.<\/p>\n<p>Recently, SBE sent the General Assembly the number of voters affected by the MVA registration change issue by party, precinct, state legislative district and Congressional district.\u00a0 We show the total number of voters affected by state legislative district below.\u00a0\u00a0(Note:\u00a0 The data does not include all potentially impacted voters because SBE cannot map all addresses on file with MVA to addresses in the voter registration list.)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Total-MVA-Voters.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-11545\" src=\"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Total-MVA-Voters.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"935\" height=\"781\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Total-MVA-Voters.png 935w, https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Total-MVA-Voters-300x251.png 300w, https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Total-MVA-Voters-768x642.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 935px) 100vw, 935px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Now what happened to these voters?\u00a0 These are folks who tried to change their voter registration address or party affiliation at MVA and, unfortunately, the changes were not passed on to SBE.\u00a0 One of five events would have happened to these voters.<\/p>\n<p>Possibility 1: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marylandmatters.org\/single-post\/2018\/07\/13\/MVA-Head-Offers-Explanation-Apology-for-Voter-Registration-Computer-Glitch\">5,163 affected voters voted normally<\/a> because they changed addresses within the same area.\u00a0 We don\u2019t have their distribution by legislative district.<\/p>\n<p>Possibility 2: They could have voted through a provisional ballot which was subsequently accepted.<\/p>\n<p>Possibility 3: They could have voted through a provisional ballot which was subsequently rejected.<\/p>\n<p>Possibility 4: They could have been told at the polling place that they must cast a provisional ballot and then left without voting.<\/p>\n<p>Possibility 5: They may not have tried to vote at all.<\/p>\n<p>Right now, we don\u2019t know the distribution in each one of the above five event categories.\u00a0 We do know that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marylandmatters.org\/single-post\/2018\/07\/13\/MVA-Head-Offers-Explanation-Apology-for-Voter-Registration-Computer-Glitch\">the number of affected voters who voted provisionally was 3,538<\/a> but we don\u2019t know how many of those ballots were rejected.\u00a0 Possibility 4 \u2013 leaving the polling location without voting \u2013 is the most unknowable of all and also the most disturbing.\u00a0 It\u2019s also a very real possibility as illustrated by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marylandmatters.org\/single-post\/2018\/07\/13\/MVA-Head-Offers-Explanation-Apology-for-Voter-Registration-Computer-Glitch\">Maryland Matters\u2019 report<\/a> of this exchange at a General Assembly hearing between SBE Administrator Linda Lamone and two state legislators.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Del. Eric G. Luedtke (D-Montgomery) seemed concerned that while the estimated overall turnout statewide was about 25 percent, among the affected voters \u2013 roughly 8,700 affected voters who used either provisional or regular ballots \u2013 the turnout was less than 10 percent.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIs it reasonable to say that this may have had a deterrent effect on voters, or are you concerned that it could have had a deterrent effect on voters?\u201d Luedtke asked.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYes,\u201d Lamone replied.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s a key issue for us,\u201d Luedtke said.<\/p>\n<p>Sen. Paul G. Pinsky (D-Prince George\u2019s), vice chairman of the Education, Health and Environmental Affairs Committee, asked Lamone if she knew of any studies that showed the use of a provisional ballot was \u201cdissuasive.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI have seen some discussion of that, senator,\u201d she said. \u201cI haven\u2019t seen the numbers, but I have seen some discussion that people believe that it\u2019s less than a vote \u2013 it\u2019s not a real ballot.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Under further questioning by Pinsky, Lamone agreed that voters could have been put off by the prospect of using a provisional ballot.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere could be some number of voters out there who didn\u2019t vote because of this error?\u201d Pinsky asked.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s correct,\u201d Lamone replied.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Did any primary election results change because of this mistake?\u00a0 We will never be able to answer that question, but we can identify some elections that were close enough so that an impact was possible.\u00a0 Below are eight races across the state in which the number of voters affected by the MVA issue was at least five times the winning margin held by the victor.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Close-Primaries.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-11543\" src=\"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Close-Primaries.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"934\" height=\"261\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Close-Primaries.png 934w, https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Close-Primaries-300x84.png 300w, https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Close-Primaries-768x215.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 934px) 100vw, 934px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This does not include the <a href=\"https:\/\/wtop.com\/local-politics-elections-news\/2018\/07\/olszewski-wins-recount-in-baltimore-co-executive-race-by-17-votes\/\">Baltimore County Executive race<\/a> (a seventeen-vote margin after recount) or the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.baltimoresun.com\/news\/maryland\/howard\/ph-ho-cf-walsh-weinstein-recount-0719-story.html\">Howard County Council District 1 race<\/a> (a six-vote margin after recount) because their boundaries do not match state legislative district data, but obviously, they could have been affected.\u00a0 Other than those two races, the ones in which the MVA mistake had the greatest probability of affecting the election were the contests for Montgomery County Executive and House District 16.\u00a0 In the MoCo Executive race, <a href=\"https:\/\/elections.maryland.gov\/elections\/2018\/results\/Primary\/gen_results_2018_1_by_county_160.html\">Marc Elrich led by 492 votes in early and election day voting<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.montgomerycountymd.gov\/Elections\/Resources\/Files\/htm\/2018\/precinctresults\/results\/Provisional%20Official%20Results.HTM\">David Blair led by 73 votes in provisional voting<\/a>.\u00a0 That compares to a total of 5,381 MoCo Democrats affected by the MVA issue.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/MoCo-Democrats-Affected.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-11544\" src=\"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/MoCo-Democrats-Affected.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"194\" height=\"281\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Going forward, there are two areas of concern.\u00a0 First, there must not be a recurrence of this issue in the general election.\u00a0 And second, now that the state has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/local\/md-politics\/maryland-bill-that-allows-automatic-voter-registration-becomes-law-without-gov-hogans-signature\/2018\/04\/06\/fb506504-3995-11e8-9c0a-85d477d9a226_story.html?utm_term=.7591c77ebe1a\">passed automatic voter registration<\/a>, a law that mandates the passing of voter information between numerous state agencies and SBE, the potential for the kinds of problems seen at MVA is now greatly magnified.\u00a0 Imagine the chaos that would result from MANY thousands of voters showing up to the polls thinking they had registered but then finding out that SBE did not have their information.\u00a0 It would make the MVA issue look tiny and would have the potential to affect a whole lot more elections.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Adam Pagnucco. The failure of the Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) to transfer data on some voters who changed their registration information to the State Board of Elections (SBE) has attracted lots of attention from the press and members of the General Assembly.\u00a0 Here is a key question: did it actually change the outcomes of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/?p=11542\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Did the MVA Voter Issue Change Any Maryland Primary Results?<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[151,492,228,214,226],"tags":[1545,1627,1572,769,2159],"class_list":["post-11542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-adam-pagnucco","category-county-executive","category-district-16","category-state-board-of-elections","category-voter-registration","tag-adam-pagnucco","tag-county-executive","tag-district-16","tag-maryland-state-board-of-elections","tag-voter-registration"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4mKJE-30a","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11542"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11542\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11549,"href":"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11542\/revisions\/11549"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theseventhstate.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}